Please note that you are using an outdated browser which is not compatible with some elements of the site. We strongly urge you to update to Edge for an optimal browsing experience.

Beware double agent commission whammy

21 Aug 2014

It makes sense to give one agency the sole mandate to sell and market your property. Not only does it allow you to work with the agent of your choice, but it should also provide protection against claims for commission by other agents.

A sole mandate is a privilege and not a right - sellers must ensure that they grant such mandate on terms that are acceptable to them, to agents who will act on such mandate.

Where you give more than one agency the mandate to sell your property, it is possible that potential buyers may have viewed the property with more than one agency, without you knowing it.

This is according to Karien Hunter, Founder and Director of law firm AMC Hunter Inc, who says by way of example, a person views a property at a show house, shows no interest in the property and then, weeks or even months later, buys the property through another agency, after the sole mandate had lapsed.

It is also quite common for sole mandates to include a clause which stipulates that the agency would be entitled to their commission in circumstances where the property was sold to anyone who had viewed the property during the existence of the sole mandate period, after the mandate period.

“We suggest sellers apply these rules in order to avoid any potential claims for double commission, and to facilitate the sale. Firstly, make sure you only grant a sole mandate to an agency in your area which has a good reputation and good track record in terms of concluded sales. Ask the agent for a marketing plan and hold them to it.

“Make sure the mandate correctly reflects what was discussed with the agent before your sign; insert a clause to the effect that the agency shall furnish you with a list of names of people who had viewed the property through their agency during the mandate period, upon expiry of the mandate period, and lastly, when you are presented with any offers by other agents, it will be easy to check if such person(s) had viewed the property previously with this agency; and when you are presented with an offer, make sure the sale agreement contains a clause whereby the purchaser warrants that they had not viewed the property through any other agency and where they indemnify you against any claim by another agency,” says Hunter.

She explains that a sole mandate is a privilege and not a right - sellers must ensure that they grant such mandate on terms that are acceptable to them, to agents who will act on such mandate. 

A mandate is a ‘fixed term contract’ in terms of the Consumer Protection Act, 68 of 2008, and if all else fails, can be terminated by giving 20 business days written notice - regardless of the duration of the mandate agreement. If a buyer viewed the property whilst the mandate was still in place, the seller may still be faced with a potential claim for commission.

Print Print
Top Articles
The South African property market in 2024 has been anything but stagnant. With exciting shifts in buyer behaviour, rental trends, and investment opportunities, this year has been a whirlwind of activity and adaptation.

What sets the luxury market apart is its independence from broader economic trends and understanding what drives this market requires looking beyond the numbers to the intangibles that define true luxury.

With interest rates finally on the decline and rental vacancy rates lower than they’ve been in years, property is an excellent investment option as long as the homework is done

Loading